Fundamental policy.
March 2007 - Oslo.
Life on this earth is guided by physical laws that have been set by the universe at the beginning of time. These laws of nature have guided the lifeforms in forming their principles of life.
Life: The bird is dependent on the habitat to provide for his food. The
bird has through evolution adapted and become very self sufficient as long as the
habitat provides insects it can nurture on.
Limitation: Population growth is regulated by
nature by having starvation if the bird population if the birds become too many
and exceed their resources.
Progress: The entire population in the area stays healthy by having competition
and a constant process to keep the good and remove the bad.
When looking at this system it is beautiful because it is proven to work over millions of years on Earth. The result is simply come because adapting to the principles that work.
During the times man has had very high thoughts of his self. At times he has tried very hard to defy the laws of nature.
This is a real example, and it probably not that uncommon. There lives a woman in Norway, she lives on welfare of some kind because of some medical problem in her feet. She is able to stand outside and smoke several hours a day though, but it is allegedly a very painful nerve complication in the feet.
Living: This woman does nothing to earn her life. She is basically a parasite on the income earning population. She makes her living basically on free handouts from some big kind unknown hole in the sky that effortlessly produces all her needs.
Corrupting the laws of nature: She is a animal friend and is a member of an animal protection organization. She has a cat pet that she feeds. The cat is an indoor cat. She has set up feeding place outside for stray cats that she tries to catch for the animal protection organization, if and when caught the cats will be given a new owner or killed if it is old and sick. She throws bread crumbs into the bushes for the birds.
Also she likes other people's cats and dogs, she talk to them like some people talk to their little babies. She smiles when the animals do cute things.
Analysis: This is obviously a very unnatural setting for life. Both for the human being and the
animals. The pure laws of nature has been replaced by a grotesque reality. The
reality is purely man made.
Providing for someone else than ones own family or children is very unnatural. In welfare states and
communistic countries this flaw has been put into system, and made it possible
to live without providing for one self. In nature the ones that can not live
on their own die. This is not accepted by from a emotional standpoint of some people
. But on the contrary most of nature operate on a set of rules that do not
consider emotions. It may be thought as cruel by animal lovers that a bird with a broken wing is left to die, but
nature does not. But what is more cruel is to have pets as for of toy for the
lack of human nature.
The woman is obviously projecting her caregiving as a form of social justice to
the birds, in a very similar way as she is receiving her paycheck for doing nothing.
The birds do not need to be given food to survive. Birds are very adapted and
are very able to find their own food. Feeding only leads to overpopulation, that
are forced to be corrected by when the human feeding stops. It is an awful mockery of nature.
It is very unnatural for a woman to have a cat as a child. She is obviously substituting
her inability to mate and have a child, by getting a cat and talking to it as it
is a human baby.
The human race has become very caught up in the emotions. Pity for the unable
is such a goal. But the reason for many of the grotesque deviations from nature is caused
by emotions. People should never be in pain or discomfort it seems, if they would it would
be too painful to bear for the person not in this situation.
The problem with organizing the world in a construct that is very far from natural, is that it gets very backwards, complicated and illogical. The world will turn slower and it will be less efficient. Consider the amount of working hours that could be released on the world if all the sick and old were left to themselves or had to pay for their services. Consider the amount of money that could be put to increased living standard and securing business if there were no payments to non working people. People would adapt to this regime because it is natural, and because that is how we originally evolved into human beings about 200.000 years ago. There would perhaps be incidents of people failing and falling very low, but there would also be unleashed a great potential that would out do the sum of all pain. Outlawing pain and misery from society is unnatural.
Author: Jarle Brandt. Copyright. Research style and method.
Funding provided by: Investing,
Trump MS. Get your link here for only $100 a month.